Understanding the Google Screened Dispute Process
Google’s new system automatically evaluates whether a lead is valid within 72 hours of being charged. If Google determines a lead is irrelevant or of low quality, your account may receive a credit. However, businesses can no longer manually dispute leads they find unsatisfactory, such as calls for services they don’t provide, locations they don’t serve, or spam-generated contacts.
This change puts businesses in a position where they need to depend more on Google’s system, raising questions about how accurate and efficient the auto-adjudication will be in resolving disputed leads.
The Importance of Lead Ratings
Although the Auto Crediting System simplifies lead validation, it also places greater responsibility on businesses to rate their leads through Google’s platform. This feedback helps improve the system, refining which types of leads are most valuable and which are less relevant.
- Negatively Rated Leads: Marking leads as low-quality or irrelevant gives Google’s system valuable feedback, which should, in theory, help reduce the number of bad leads over time. However, it’s important to note that this feedback doesn’t guarantee an immediate credit for poor leads. Only after Google detects similar feedback patterns might a credit be issued.
- Positively Rated Leads: Rating high-quality leads helps train Google’s system to send more relevant prospects in the future. However, relying on a system-driven solution for lead quality may limit businesses' direct control over filtering invalid contacts.
The Auto Adjudication Process
Businesses can expect Google’s system to review leads within 72 hours of being charged. If a lead is deemed invalid, any credit will appear in your billing within 30 days. While this might reduce the need for manual intervention, the process is automated, raising concerns about the level of oversight available to ensure accurate dispute resolutions.
Why Rating Your Leads is Critical
Google urges all advertisers to rate their leads within 30 days. This feedback plays a critical role in how the system evolves. If businesses do not provide timely input, the opportunity to improve the lead quality diminishes. In essence, the onus falls more on businesses to monitor and report on lead quality, without the previous manual recourse to dispute issues immediately.
What This Means for Your Business
While this update reduces the time spent disputing invalid leads, it may introduce new challenges for businesses looking for more control over the quality of contacts they receive. The shift towards a more automated system means businesses must now actively rate leads to shape the future performance of the platform. Without manual dispute options, businesses could face frustration if the system fails to recognize poor leads promptly.
If your business needs guidance navigating these changes or enhancing the quality of your LSA leads, our team is here to help ensure your marketing budget is effectively allocated and that you achieve success in your local market.